1976 Zastava 850 K vs. 2013 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2013 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Volkswagen Eos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volkswagen Eos (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 740 kg more than 1976 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Zastava 850 K | 2013 Volkswagen Eos | |
| Make | Zastava | Volkswagen |
| Model | 850 K | Eos |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 2000 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1595 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1791 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1443 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2578 mm |
