1977 Abarth A 112 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Abarth A 112 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | A 112 | CTS |
Year Released | 1977 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 5965 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 400 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2890 mm |