1977 Alfa Romeo GTV vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Alfa Romeo GTV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Alfa Romeo GTV would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Colorado (210 HP) has 79 more horse power than 1977 Alfa Romeo GTV. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1977 Alfa Romeo GTV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Colorado (313 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Alfa Romeo GTV. (190 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Alfa Romeo GTV. 2009 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1977 Alfa Romeo GTV has manual transmission. 1977 Alfa Romeo GTV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Alfa Romeo GTV | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | GTV | Colorado |
Year Released | 1977 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1962 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 313 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |