1977 AMC Matador vs. 2003 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2003 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 AMC Matador (120 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 AMC Matador weights approximately 1036 kg more than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1977 AMC Matador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 AMC Matador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 AMC Matador (298 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1977 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. 1977 AMC Matador has automatic transmission and 2003 Daewoo Matiz has manual transmission. 2003 Daewoo Matiz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1977 AMC Matador will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 AMC Matador | 2003 Daewoo Matiz | |
| Make | AMC | Daewoo |
| Model | Matador | Matiz |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4982 cc | 994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 68.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.4 mm | 67.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1861 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 92 L | 38 L |
