1977 AMC Matador vs. 2010 Holden Barina
To start off, 2010 Holden Barina is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1977 AMC Matador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 AMC Matador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 AMC Matador (298 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Barina. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1977 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Barina. 1977 AMC Matador has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden Barina has manual transmission. 2010 Holden Barina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1977 AMC Matador will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1977 AMC Matador | 2010 Holden Barina | |
Make | AMC | Holden |
Model | Matador | Barina |
Year Released | 1977 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4982 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1650 mm |