1977 Aston Martin V8 vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1977 Aston Martin V8 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 5,339 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Aston Martin V8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Aston Martin V8 (340 HP) has 276 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Aston Martin V8 should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Because 1977 Aston Martin V8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Aston Martin V8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Aston Martin V8 (542 Nm) has 446 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm). This means 1977 Aston Martin V8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Aston Martin V8 | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Riley |
| Model | V8 | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1977 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 5339 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 340 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2380 mm |
