1977 Aston Martin V8 vs. 2002 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Aston Martin V8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Aston Martin V8 would be higher. At 5,339 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Aston Martin V8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Aston Martin V8 (340 HP) has 250 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econovan. (90 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Aston Martin V8 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Aston Martin V8 (542 Nm) has 404 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm). This means 1977 Aston Martin V8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Aston Martin V8 | 2002 Ford Econovan | |
Make | Aston Martin | Ford |
Model | V8 | Econovan |
Year Released | 1977 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5339 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 90 HP |
Torque | 542 Nm | 138 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2210 mm |