1977 Aston Martin V8 vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Aston Martin V8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Aston Martin V8 would be higher. At 5,339 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Aston Martin V8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Aston Martin V8 (340 HP) has 234 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Aston Martin V8 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio.
Because 1977 Aston Martin V8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Aston Martin V8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Aston Martin V8 (542 Nm) has 394 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (148 Nm). This means 1977 Aston Martin V8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Aston Martin V8 | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | Aston Martin | Renault |
Model | V8 | Clio |
Year Released | 1977 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5339 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 542 Nm | 148 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 225 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2480 mm |