1977 Audi 100 vs. 2005 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Audi 100 would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 259 more horse power than 1977 Audi 100. (136 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1977 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 560 kg more than 1977 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 364 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Audi 100. (172 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Audi 100 | 2005 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 100 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 136 HP | 395 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 172 Nm | 536 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |
