1977 Audi 100 vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1977 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Audi 100 (136 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2010 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 130 kg more than 1977 Audi 100.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Audi 100. (172 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Audi 100 | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 100 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1977 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |