1977 Audi 50 vs. 1963 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1977 Audi 50 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Audi 50 | 1963 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | 50 | Elan |
Year Released | 1977 | 1963 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1430 mm |