1977 Audi 50 vs. 1969 Jaguar 240
To start off, 1977 Audi 50 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Audi 50 | 1969 Jaguar 240 | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | 50 | 240 |
| Year Released | 1977 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 770 cc | 2483 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 131 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1700 mm |
