1977 Audi 50 vs. 1976 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1977 Audi 50 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,480 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Audi 50 | 1976 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | Audi | Zastava |
| Model | 50 | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1977 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 770 cc | 1480 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1550 mm |
