1977 Audi 50 vs. 1992 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 1992 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Audi 50 would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1992 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Audi 50 | 1992 Jaguar XJ220 | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | 50 | XJ220 |
Year Released | 1977 | 1992 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 3492 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 542 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2020 mm |