1977 Audi 50 vs. 2002 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Audi 50 would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Audi 50 | 2002 Chrysler Crossfire | |
Make | Audi | Chrysler |
Model | 50 | Crossfire |
Year Released | 1977 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 3195 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 215 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1770 mm |