1977 Audi 50 vs. 2002 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2002 Nissan Cima is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Audi 50 would be higher. At 4,498 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Audi 50 | 2002 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 50 | Cima |
Year Released | 1977 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 4498 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1850 mm |