1977 Audi 50 vs. 2007 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Audi 50 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2007 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2007 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1977 Audi 50 has manual transmission. 1977 Audi 50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Audi 50 | 2007 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 50 | CTS |
Year Released | 1977 | 2007 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 2792 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 212 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1800 mm |