1977 Audi 50 vs. 2013 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2013 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Audi 50 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Toyota 4Runner is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Toyota 4Runner. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 1977 Audi 50 has manual transmission. 1977 Audi 50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Audi 50 | 2013 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | 50 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1272 cc | 4000 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1925 mm |
