1977 Austin Allegro vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 1977 Austin Allegro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Hudson Commodore (128 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1977 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Hudson Commodore should accelerate faster than 1977 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 806 kg more than 1977 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Austin Allegro | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
Make | Austin | Hudson |
Model | Allegro | Commodore |
Year Released | 1977 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1274 cc | 4166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 128 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1656 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3160 mm |