1977 Austin Allegro vs. 1960 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1977 Austin Allegro is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1977 Austin Allegro.
Because 1960 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Austin Allegro | 1960 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | Allegro | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 1977 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1274 cc | 2197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2060 mm |
