1977 Austin Allegro vs. 1962 Humber Hawk
To start off, 1977 Austin Allegro is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Humber Hawk (73 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1977 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Humber Hawk should accelerate faster than 1977 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Humber Hawk weights approximately 585 kg more than 1977 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Humber Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Humber Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Austin Allegro | 1962 Humber Hawk | |
| Make | Austin | Humber |
| Model | Allegro | Hawk |
| Year Released | 1977 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1274 cc | 2265 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 73 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1435 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2800 mm |
