1977 Austin Allegro vs. 1969 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1977 Austin Allegro is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,274 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Austin Allegro (59 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1969 ZAZ 966. (27 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Austin Allegro should accelerate faster than 1969 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Austin Allegro weights approximately 110 kg more than 1969 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Austin Allegro | 1969 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Austin | ZAZ |
Model | Allegro | 966 |
Year Released | 1977 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1274 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 27 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2170 mm |