1977 Austin Allegro vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,410 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste (74 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1977 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste should accelerate faster than 1977 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste weights approximately 60 kg more than 1977 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Austin Allegro | 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | Allegro | Celeste |
Year Released | 1977 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1274 cc | 1410 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2350 mm |