1977 Austin Allegro vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1982 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (70 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1977 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1977 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 15 kg more than 1977 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Nissan Pulsar has automatic transmission and 1977 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1977 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Nissan Pulsar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Austin Allegro | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Allegro | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1977 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1274 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2420 mm |