1977 Austin Allegro vs. 1998 Ford Puma
To start off, 1998 Ford Puma is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Puma (89 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1977 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1977 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Puma weights approximately 160 kg more than 1977 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Austin Allegro | 1998 Ford Puma | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | Allegro | Puma |
| Year Released | 1977 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1274 cc | 1388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2450 mm |
