1977 Austin Allegro vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (190 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1977 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1977 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 540 kg more than 1977 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Austin Allegro | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | Allegro | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1274 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 190 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1390 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2580 mm |
