1977 Austin Allegro vs. 2003 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1977 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1977 Austin Allegro.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Austin Allegro | 2003 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Allegro | Tracker |
Year Released | 1977 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1274 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 97 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2210 mm |