1977 Austin Allegro vs. 2010 Mazda RX-8

To start off, 2010 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,300 cc, 2010 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda RX-8 (212 HP) has 153 more horse power than 1977 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1977 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 561 kg more than 1977 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1977 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1977 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: