1977 Austin Allegro vs. 2010 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2010 Nissan Rogue is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Rogue (170 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1977 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1977 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 671 kg more than 1977 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Austin Allegro | 2010 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Allegro | Rogue |
Year Released | 1977 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1274 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 170 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1521 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4646 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2690 mm |