1977 Austin Marina vs. 1958 Cadillac Biarritz
To start off, 1977 Austin Marina is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Biarritz (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1977 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 1977 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 1420 kg more than 1977 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Austin Marina | 1958 Cadillac Biarritz | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Marina | Biarritz |
| Year Released | 1977 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 2300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3300 mm |
