1977 Austin Marina vs. 2010 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2010 Nissan Murano is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Austin Marina would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Murano weights approximately 866 kg more than 1977 Austin Marina.
Because 1977 Austin Marina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Austin Marina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Murano, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Austin Marina | 2010 Nissan Murano | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Marina | Murano |
Year Released | 1977 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1695 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 265 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1806 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2824 mm |