1977 Austin Maxi vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1977 Austin Maxi is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,485 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Austin Maxi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Austin Maxi (68 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Austin Maxi should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 230 kg more than 1977 Austin Maxi.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Austin Maxi | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | Maxi | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1977 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1485 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 75 L |
