1977 Austin Maxi vs. 1962 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1977 Austin Maxi is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Austin Maxi (68 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Austin Maxi should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1977 Austin Maxi.
Because 1962 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Austin Maxi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Austin Maxi. (104 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1962 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Austin Maxi | 1962 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | Maxi | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1977 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1485 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 104 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2060 mm |