1977 Austin Maxi vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1977 Austin Maxi. (68 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1977 Austin Maxi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 612 kg more than 1977 Austin Maxi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (298 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Austin Maxi. (104 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Austin Maxi | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Maxi | CTS |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1485 cc | 3179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 104 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1592 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 66 L |
