1977 Austin Princess vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1977 Austin Princess is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,700 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Austin Princess weights approximately 500 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Austin Princess | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Austin | DAF |
Model | Princess | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1977 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 745 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 26 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2060 mm |