1977 Austin Princess vs. 1996 Dodge Ram
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Austin Princess would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Austin Princess weights approximately 74 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Austin Princess | 1996 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | Princess | Ram |
| Year Released | 1977 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1086 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3020 mm |
