1977 BMW 320 vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1977 BMW 320 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1977 BMW 320. (161 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1977 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1977 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 BMW 320 | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 320 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1977 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 2070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3300 mm |
