1977 BMW 320 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,190 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 BMW 320 (161 HP) has 41 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1977 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 165 kg more than 1977 BMW 320.
Because 1977 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 BMW 320 | 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 320 | Cavalier |
Year Released | 1977 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2190 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 120 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2650 mm |