1977 BMW 320 vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,442 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 BMW 320 (161 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2003 Volvo V50. (139 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1977 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo V50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo V50 weights approximately 415 kg more than 1977 BMW 320.
Because 1977 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 BMW 320 | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | 320 | V50 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 139 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 90 mm |
Top Speed | 191 km/hour | 205 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1465 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2720 mm |