1977 BMW 530 vs. 2000 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2000 Dodge Durango is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 BMW 530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 BMW 530 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Durango weights approximately 65 kg more than 1977 BMW 530.
Because 2000 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 BMW 530. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Durango (454 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 BMW 530. (256 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 BMW 530. 2000 Dodge Durango has automatic transmission and 1977 BMW 530 has manual transmission. 1977 BMW 530 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Dodge Durango will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1977 BMW 530 | 2000 Dodge Durango | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 530 | Durango |
Year Released | 1977 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2788 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 256 Nm | 454 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2950 mm |