1977 BMW 628 vs. 2004 Mazda 3
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 BMW 628. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 BMW 628 would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 BMW 628 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 BMW 628 (185 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 3. (144 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 BMW 628 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 3.
Because 1977 BMW 628 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 BMW 628. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 BMW 628 (260 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 3. (184 Nm). This means 1977 BMW 628 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1977 BMW 628 | 2004 Mazda 3 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 628 | 3 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2997 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 184 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |