1977 BMW 628 vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 BMW 628. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 BMW 628 would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (459 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 1977 BMW 628. (185 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1977 BMW 628.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 BMW 628. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (630 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 BMW 628. (260 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 BMW 628.
Compare all specifications:
1977 BMW 628 | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 628 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1977 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2997 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 459 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 630 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2156 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 93 L |