1977 Bristol 412 vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1977 Bristol 412. (171 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1977 Bristol 412.
Because 1977 Bristol 412 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Bristol 412. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 366 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Bristol 412 | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Bristol | Mazda |
Model | 412 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2880 mm |