1977 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1998 Zagato Zuma
To start off, 1998 Zagato Zuma is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 900 kg more than 1998 Zagato Zuma.
Because 1977 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Zagato Zuma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Cadillac Brougham | 1998 Zagato Zuma | |
Make | Cadillac | Zagato |
Model | Brougham | Zuma |
Year Released | 1977 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5031 cc | 1894 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2520 mm |