1977 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2002 Mazda 6
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 460 kg more than 2002 Mazda 6.
Because 2002 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Cadillac Brougham | 2002 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Brougham | 6 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5031 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 164 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2680 mm |