1977 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2003 Mazda 2
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 870 kg more than 2003 Mazda 2.
Because 1977 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Cadillac Brougham | 2003 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Brougham | 2 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5031 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2500 mm |