1977 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2003 Mazda 2
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 4,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 530 kg more than 2003 Mazda 2.
Because 1977 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Chevrolet Impala | 2003 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Impala | 2 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4389 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2500 mm |