1977 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2005 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,788 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 348 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Reno.
Because 1977 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Chevrolet Impala | 2005 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Impala | Reno |
Year Released | 1977 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3788 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 126 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1262 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2610 mm |