1977 Chevrolet Nova vs. 1998 Acura CL
To start off, 1998 Acura CL is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 4,091 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Chevrolet Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura CL (150 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1977 Chevrolet Nova. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1977 Chevrolet Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Acura CL weights approximately 90 kg more than 1977 Chevrolet Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1977 Chevrolet Nova is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Chevrolet Nova. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Chevrolet Nova | 1998 Acura CL | |
Make | Chevrolet | Acura |
Model | Nova | CL |
Year Released | 1977 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4091 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 150 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2715 mm |