1977 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1977 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1977 Chevrolet Suburban. (100 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1977 Chevrolet Suburban. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1977 Chevrolet Suburban (242 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1977 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Chevrolet Suburban | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Suburban | 2000 |
Year Released | 1977 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4093 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 242 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2700 mm |